Dear ERCIM News Reader,
ERCIM News No. 91 has just been published at http://ercim-news.ercim.eu/
Special Theme: "What is Computation? — Alan Turing’s Legacy"
Guest editors: Gilles Dowek, Inria, and Samson Abramsky, University of Oxford
http://ercim-news.ercim.eu/en91/special
Keynote: "The Impact of Alan Turing" by Andrew Hodges
http://ercim-news.ercim.eu/en91/keynote
This issue for download in pdf:
http://ercim-news.ercim.eu/images/stories/EN91/EN91-web.pdf
Next issue: No. 92, January 2012 - Special Theme: "Smart Energy Systems"
(see call at http://ercim-news.ercim.eu/call)
Thank you for your interest in ERCIM News.
Feel free to forward this message to others who might be interested.
Peter Kunz
ERCIM News central editor
Saturday, 13 October 2012
ERCIM News No. 91 Special Theme: "What is Computation? — Alan Turing’s Legacy"
Labels:
academia,
analysis,
bioinformatics,
computing,
data,
education,
EU,
history,
individual,
informatics,
information,
media,
programming,
research,
robotics,
science,
security,
systems,
technology,
UK
Wednesday, 10 October 2012
World Mental Health Day & Hodges' model
Today is World Mental Health Day. Here are some mental health related concepts mapped to Hodges' model that I have encountered over the past few weeks (I could list many more of course).
See also: Hodges' model - indicative content
INTERPERSONAL : SCIENCES
SOCIOLOGY : POLITICAL
| depression, suicidal ideas, motivation, beliefs, agitation, assessment tools, understanding of treatment, communication skills, confusion, aggression, lability of mood, loss, disorientation, orientation, concordance, stress and vulnerability, observation, distress | risk assessment, electroconvulsive therapy benzodiazepines, anti-depresssants, side-effects, gait, pain, care environment, diagnosis of depression, anxiety, dementia, records - behaviour charts, electronic health record, security |
| carer under stress, reassurance, counselling skills, respite care, family therapy empathy and rapport with residents (colleagues...), patient and relative engagement, activities, distraction, engagement, life history, touch, care strategies and recommendations, smiles, companionship | commissioning, funding of services, consent, integrated working effectiveness, referral-on, care vouchers, advocacy, service access, compliance, use of Mental Health Act, staff survey, gatekeeping - access to beds, work allocation, health & nursing in the media |
See also: Hodges' model - indicative content
Tuesday, 9 October 2012
A shoutout to University of Northumbria at Newcastle - and others!
Although school terms and university semesters vary especially between the northern and southern hemispheres, I can often tell when a new academic year is upon us again. Not only that, but possibly a new cohort of nursing or other health care related students.
The signal is the visitors to the old website. The past week or so there's been a lot of traffic from University of Northumbria at Newcastle. Only the institution is listed, not individuals. And don't get excited about the numbers: we are talking 10s here not 100s and 1000s.
Those tens (still greatly appreciated!) could be even more significant if I could connect with someone. So if you are revisiting this blog and from UoN or any other institution please get in touch: h2cmng at yahoo.co.uk
I would really help to hear your views on:
What prompted your visit?
Who are you - what's your role, course and stage of learning?
How are you using the site and model (if at all) is it:
What is useful and should be archived?
What sucks!
Is there something that you could add to a future site?
Do you have work on h2cm that I could highlight here on W2tQ?
There are many rich seams to dig here and if we can work together we might find some light.
There is someone at UoN I will approach if they are still there: quite possibly!
The signal is the visitors to the old website. The past week or so there's been a lot of traffic from University of Northumbria at Newcastle. Only the institution is listed, not individuals. And don't get excited about the numbers: we are talking 10s here not 100s and 1000s.
Those tens (still greatly appreciated!) could be even more significant if I could connect with someone. So if you are revisiting this blog and from UoN or any other institution please get in touch: h2cmng at yahoo.co.uk
I would really help to hear your views on:
What prompted your visit?
Who are you - what's your role, course and stage of learning?
How are you using the site and model (if at all) is it:
- as part of an exercise merely identifying models of nursing, aspects of nursing theory...?
- as part of a piece of (reflective) written work?
- applying the model to a specific context, case study, nursing (or other) discipline?
- as a critical nursing or informatics exercise?
- as an initial exercise to help assure holistic care?
- some other discipline and purpose perhaps?
What is useful and should be archived?
What sucks!
Is there something that you could add to a future site?
Do you have work on h2cm that I could highlight here on W2tQ?
There are many rich seams to dig here and if we can work together we might find some light.
There is someone at UoN I will approach if they are still there: quite possibly!
Monday, 8 October 2012
Call for Papers: 2nd European Design4Health Conference

I am pleased to [announce] the Call for Papers for the 2nd European Design4Health Conference, which will be held at Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, UK from Wed 3rd to Fri 5th July 2013.
The conference provides a platform for dialogue between designers, healthcare professionals, funding bodies, researchers and users. We invite submissions to the conference in the following forms:
- Abstract submissions: extended abstracts that address the conference themes
- Exhibition proposals: exhibits of innovative artefacts or systems that make significant progress in design for health
Kind regards
Kirsty Christer and Dr Alaster Yoxall
Edited from source - JISCMAIL for context (no attachments). PJ
Labels:
artefacts,
care design,
care pathway,
conference,
creativity,
design,
devices,
engagement,
EU,
exhibition,
funding,
health,
home care,
innovation,
long-term medical conditions,
research,
systems,
UK,
users
The Information Centre: October bulletin
Welcome to the October edition of IC Knowledge
Welcome back to IC Knowledge, the online bulletin that keeps you up-to-date with new data releases, service news and forthcoming events.In our first edition we look at:
- New data linkage service now available
- GPES to provide data for QOF payments from April 2013
- Data workshop set to inspire innovation in use of information
- National Diabetes Audit set for busy autumn of activity
- First ever Social Care Outcomes Framework published
- Updated commissioning data sets due next month
- Improved mental health report among new statistics due out soon
Read the latest edition now
My source: IC subscription
Copyright © 2012, Re-used with the permission of the Health and Social Care Information Centre. All rights reserved.
Thursday, 4 October 2012
Book review: Nursing Knowledge: Science, Practice, and Philosophy
Searching for an up-to-date nursing theory book I wanted something different from the usual fare. The usual fare being a description of the various nursing theories, models and frameworks to date. I needed a text that would help me in two ways: firstly, deal with and critique the foundations of nursing theory; secondly, to provide some insights that would inform my own study into Hodges' model. I quickly found a book with a bonus: it is written by a philosopher.
Mark Risjord's - Nursing Knowledge: Science, Practice, and Philosophy (Wiley-Blackwell, 2010).
This is not a large book considering the literature within its potential purview at just 246 pages in total. The text is very readable both visually and in style. Even if points need to be re-read this isn't a chore. Evidence of structure and discipline runs from paragraphs to the overall division into seven parts, with the usual reference listing and index. As a nursing student of the late 70s and early 80s this book needed to reframe this subject for lifelong learning student of the 2010s. Risjord starts by examining the history - prehistory no less - of the problem.
Key questions that have arisen in nursing and directed thought are discussed. The influence of what was happening simultaneously in the philosophy of science and culture is also related. The writing is succinct (as already suggested) on page 18 we have an explanation for the appearance of the relevance gap, how this gap endures and how it might be closed.
Central to the demographic, media and political challenges that nursing faces part II covers values. This brings in nursing's standpoint and more direct reference to cultural influences on nursing knowledge in particular feminism. This discussion is again brief, standpoints are very relevant for me. The combination of depth of analysis, brevity with a clear focus are a great achievement. A lesson in how to write, how to argue, how to communicate. You can only do this if you know your subject.
If I missed anything it is technology and information, but the book is probably all the better for this whether considered an omission or diversion. Seeing specific reference to multidisciplinary in the index and a discussion of nursing knowledge in relation to other disciplines would be helpful. Risjord's purpose for this book is however, clear from start to finish. It's there in the title. The book is no glossary, or dictionary, and yet the treatment of many concepts here, such as; axioms, borrowed theory, coherence, context, grand theory, and paradigm (a chapter)... will help reader's appreciate their definition and use. Seminal papers from the literature are identified and re-examined. Much of the book is devoted to research and methods with illustrative examples.
There is much to inform my studies, in particular chapter 15: Conceptual models and the fate of grand theory. Here I can conclude from Risjord that Hodges' model creates an orientation picture rather than an abstraction picture:
Acknowledgement: Many thanks to Wiley-Blackwell for the review copy.
Mark Risjord's - Nursing Knowledge: Science, Practice, and Philosophy (Wiley-Blackwell, 2010).
This is not a large book considering the literature within its potential purview at just 246 pages in total. The text is very readable both visually and in style. Even if points need to be re-read this isn't a chore. Evidence of structure and discipline runs from paragraphs to the overall division into seven parts, with the usual reference listing and index. As a nursing student of the late 70s and early 80s this book needed to reframe this subject for lifelong learning student of the 2010s. Risjord starts by examining the history - prehistory no less - of the problem.
Key questions that have arisen in nursing and directed thought are discussed. The influence of what was happening simultaneously in the philosophy of science and culture is also related. The writing is succinct (as already suggested) on page 18 we have an explanation for the appearance of the relevance gap, how this gap endures and how it might be closed.
Central to the demographic, media and political challenges that nursing faces part II covers values. This brings in nursing's standpoint and more direct reference to cultural influences on nursing knowledge in particular feminism. This discussion is again brief, standpoints are very relevant for me. The combination of depth of analysis, brevity with a clear focus are a great achievement. A lesson in how to write, how to argue, how to communicate. You can only do this if you know your subject.
If I missed anything it is technology and information, but the book is probably all the better for this whether considered an omission or diversion. Seeing specific reference to multidisciplinary in the index and a discussion of nursing knowledge in relation to other disciplines would be helpful. Risjord's purpose for this book is however, clear from start to finish. It's there in the title. The book is no glossary, or dictionary, and yet the treatment of many concepts here, such as; axioms, borrowed theory, coherence, context, grand theory, and paradigm (a chapter)... will help reader's appreciate their definition and use. Seminal papers from the literature are identified and re-examined. Much of the book is devoted to research and methods with illustrative examples.
There is much to inform my studies, in particular chapter 15: Conceptual models and the fate of grand theory. Here I can conclude from Risjord that Hodges' model creates an orientation picture rather than an abstraction picture:
On this understanding, nursing models are expressions of the philosophical background to nursing research. Conceptual models orient research and practice by guiding the selection of problems or making phenomena salient. They make no theoretical pronouncements. A conceptual model can guide research and practice only in the light of some values and goals. Nursing values and goals are thus crucial components of the conceptual model on the orientation picture. They set the agenda for nursing research by articulating what is important. p.173.I've long considered Hodges' model to be a map. Initially, a blank map - a space within which values can be deliberated. In pedalling this particular bike since 1998 I know how tired nursing theory is. Now students don't need to get on the bike, they stand on one pedal and freewheel the short distance that represents the curricula space devoted to nursing theory (and philosophy). A packed curriculum provides the momentum for the (values) by-pass. Mark Risjord concludes with new questions about nursing theory, new maps and new directions. I've outlined other points from the text for future reference. This book will remain a companion for quite some time: a great compass.
Acknowledgement: Many thanks to Wiley-Blackwell for the review copy.
Labels:
academia,
book,
care,
concepts,
conceptual framework,
debate,
definitions,
health,
Hodges Model,
media,
nurse education,
nursing,
nursing theory,
person-centred,
philosophy,
reviews,
science
Tuesday, 2 October 2012
Hodges' model: Lazy data, organisations and domain outreach (HSJ Ack.)
In the (northern) summer Dr Mark Davies (NHS Information Centre) noted that:
Looking at the model we can also see the task ahead in the many ways (domains) in which data can be put to work.
We have lots of data but it's lazy data. We have to make it work and turn it into actionable data - data we can do something with.
Interview: The hard data man's soft spot. Health Service Journal, 2 August, 2012. p.17.There are many ways that we can put data to work. In the interview with HSJ Dr Davies also highlighted the common and not unexpected emphasis upon the organisational views of the world. Here in England in management the current preoccupation is the preparation for April 2013 of clinical commissioning groups. The NHS has an incredible resource in its data. Whether or not the volume involved qualifies as big data is debatable, but in the interview Dr Davies continues:
Professionals have a duty to measure, to compare and open up their data to scrutiny. "We talk about the purchaser provider split," he says. "But I think that is the wrong purchaser and provider. It is the split between the tax payer and public services that is important. ..." p.17.I've mapped this to Hodges' model below. You could say that taxation is POLITICAL and it clearly is, but it is also part of what is frequently termed the social contract. For me this is why Dr Davies' views matter.
Looking at the model we can also see the task ahead in the many ways (domains) in which data can be put to work.
INTERPERSONAL : SCIENCES
SOCIOLOGY : POLITICAL
| PURPOSE | lazy data (inertia!) actionable data (information - knowledge) |
| public tax payers | ORGANISATIONS / \ PURCHASER PROVIDER (citizens) public services |
Labels:
care domains,
data,
datasets,
health,
Hodges Model,
HSJ,
informatics,
information,
innovation,
integrated,
journal,
media,
NHS,
organisations,
policy,
political,
public engagement,
social care,
sociology,
statistics
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


