Showing posts with label DoH. Show all posts
Showing posts with label DoH. Show all posts
Friday, 28 December 2012
Smoking health harm campaign launched UK
A Hodges' model matrix on this theme will follow in the new year.
Labels:
advertising,
attitude,
choice,
DoH,
finance,
global health,
health,
health literacy,
health promotion,
media,
mental health,
policy,
politics,
poverty,
preventive medicine,
public health,
smoking,
video
Friday, 16 March 2012
Dame Fiona Caldicott to lead confidentiality review
Dame Fiona Caldicott has agreed to lead an independent from Government review of the balance between protecting patient information and its sharing, to improve patient care.
The Department expects to respond to the panel’s recommendations when the review publishes during 2012.
The recommendation for a review of the balance between protecting patient information and its sharing, to improve patient care was part of the Future Forum’s recommendations to Government on the modernisation of health and care.
... more.
My source:
IHTSDO CoP
The Department expects to respond to the panel’s recommendations when the review publishes during 2012.
The recommendation for a review of the balance between protecting patient information and its sharing, to improve patient care was part of the Future Forum’s recommendations to Government on the modernisation of health and care.
... more.
My source:
IHTSDO CoP
Labels:
care,
confidentiality,
DoH,
e-health,
governance,
government,
health,
infocare,
informatics,
information,
innovation,
integrated,
NHS,
patiency,
policy,
records,
security,
social care,
standards,
UK
Friday, 27 January 2012
Health & Social Care - Safe Record Keeping Project
Dear Member
BCS, The Chartered Institute for IT and the Department of Health Informatics Directorate (DHID) have launched a project to develop clear and easy to follow guidance for patients and the public on the subject of health and social care records.
The project will provide patients with advice on how to look after the health and social care records and other sensitive personal data that they are creating or health and social care providers are sharing with them. BCS is inviting individuals or organisations to tender for the contract to carry out this work.
Further information about the tender process can be found at: www.bcs.org/dhid
Please do not hesitate to contact me if you require any further information.
Regards,
Dr Wai Keong Wong
Project Coordinator
BCS and DH project for safe patient record
w.wong AT bcs.org
My source: BCS, Dr Wai Keong Wong with thanks.
BCS, The Chartered Institute for IT and the Department of Health Informatics Directorate (DHID) have launched a project to develop clear and easy to follow guidance for patients and the public on the subject of health and social care records.
The project will provide patients with advice on how to look after the health and social care records and other sensitive personal data that they are creating or health and social care providers are sharing with them. BCS is inviting individuals or organisations to tender for the contract to carry out this work.
Further information about the tender process can be found at: www.bcs.org/dhid
Please do not hesitate to contact me if you require any further information.
Regards,
Dr Wai Keong Wong
Project Coordinator
BCS and DH project for safe patient record
w.wong AT bcs.org
My source: BCS, Dr Wai Keong Wong with thanks.
Wednesday, 11 January 2012
Report - Integrated care for patients and populations: Improving outcomes by working together
I've posted on integrated care previously on W2tQ. The core recommendations of this New Year report on integrated care are:
Integration in health and social care should be considered critically over the past 25 years and more (but that's a thesis). Evolution in policy matters, but there is a deep archaeology that illustrates the policy aspiration - practice gap the reports priorities seek to address. A comment in response on the King's Fund's site notes the need for (strategies, methods and) a framework. While no magic wand there is a framework that can at least unify disciplines, public and policy makers. And act as a bridge between words and actions.
Although brief (20 pages) the report is an excellent source for references (3 pages) that includes:
Kodner D, Spreeuwenberg C (2002). ‘Integrated Care: Meaning, logic, applications, and implications – a discussion paper’. International Journal of Integrated Care, vol 2,
Available at: www.ijic.org/index.php/ijic/article/view/67 (accessed 13 December 2011).
Kodner D (2009). ‘All together now: a conceptual exploration of integrated care’. Healthcare Quarterly, vol 13(Sp), pp 6–15.
Leutz W (2005). ‘Reflections on integrating medical and social care: five laws revisited. Journal of Integrated Care, vol 14, no 5, pp 3–12.
As we try to integrate words and actions we need to remember:
how we dice and slice influences the scope of integration.
We'll explore this more soon.
*Points?
Nick Goodwin, Judith Smith, Alisha Davies, Claire Perry, Rebecca Rosen, Anna Dixon, Jennifer Dixon, Chris Ham Integrated care for patients and populations: Improving outcomes by working together. Report to the Department of Health and NHS Future Forum from The King’s Fund and Nuffield Trust
- government policy should be founded on a clear, ambitious and measurable goal to improve the experience of patients and service users and to be delivered by a defined date
- patients with complex needs should be guaranteed an entitlement to an agreed care plan, a named case manager responsible for co-ordinating care, and access to telehealth and telecare and a personal health budget where appropriate
- change must be implemented at scale and pace; this will require work across large populations, significant reform and flexibility to take forward different approaches.
Integration in health and social care should be considered critically over the past 25 years and more (but that's a thesis). Evolution in policy matters, but there is a deep archaeology that illustrates the policy aspiration - practice gap the reports priorities seek to address. A comment in response on the King's Fund's site notes the need for (strategies, methods and) a framework. While no magic wand there is a framework that can at least unify disciplines, public and policy makers. And act as a bridge between words and actions.
Integration needs a shared and agreed origin.
(A point* around which disintegration turns)
Although brief (20 pages) the report is an excellent source for references (3 pages) that includes:
Kodner D, Spreeuwenberg C (2002). ‘Integrated Care: Meaning, logic, applications, and implications – a discussion paper’. International Journal of Integrated Care, vol 2,
Available at: www.ijic.org/index.php/ijic/article/view/67 (accessed 13 December 2011).
Kodner D (2009). ‘All together now: a conceptual exploration of integrated care’. Healthcare Quarterly, vol 13(Sp), pp 6–15.
Leutz W (2005). ‘Reflections on integrating medical and social care: five laws revisited. Journal of Integrated Care, vol 14, no 5, pp 3–12.
As we try to integrate words and actions we need to remember:
how we dice and slice influences the scope of integration.
We'll explore this more soon.
*Points?
Nick Goodwin, Judith Smith, Alisha Davies, Claire Perry, Rebecca Rosen, Anna Dixon, Jennifer Dixon, Chris Ham Integrated care for patients and populations: Improving outcomes by working together. Report to the Department of Health and NHS Future Forum from The King’s Fund and Nuffield Trust
Labels:
attitude,
collaboration,
complex needs,
complexity,
DoH,
finance,
HSJ,
integrated,
measures,
media,
multidisciplinary,
NHS,
outcomes,
policy,
public engagement,
report,
self-care,
standards
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)